Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify patterns and trends of hardiness studies and to suggest the direction of further research.
Method : Forty-seven hardiness studies were collected through internet searching and were reviewed by some criteria.
Result : The results showed that hardiness studies have increased rapidly since 1990’s. Eighteen studies were thesis’ for degrees and others were for non- degree research studies. All studies employed the non-experimental design, particularly correlational studies. In the sampling method, all studies used non-probability sampling. Most commonly used instrument for hardiness measurement was Pollock(1986)’s HRHS. In the majority of research, hardiness was treated both as a composite measure and 3 subscales. Hardiness-related concepts were 27 and classified into 5 categories such as health behavior, stress, adaptation, support, and others. Most common statistical technique was Pearson’s correlation coefficient, followed by regression, ANOVA, path analysis.
Conclusion : To be utilized as practical nursing knowledge, hardiness studies should be done with more empirical analysis such as experimental research, and Meta-analysis is needed to compare the effect size and significance of composit and 3 subscales of hardiness construct.
|